Sunday, June 26, 2011

Hacked? was "Busy-ness: fork( stoned ) == stone!"

I found this blog post below and thought it was strange. Looks like somebody took parts of my other posts and randomly pieced them together. Now I know why somebody called me "bot". Either that, or I uploaded my brainstorm pieces by mistake... I doubt it, yet I can still ingeniously claim such pieces with the pretense that I overcame dyslexia, if any. This style stems from the the mix of grammar with programmer logics, like hybrid English with psuedo code.

Friday, June 17, 2011

For the Love of No Known Cause

Let me "change my tone" on this "one" bit:

Example: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America_Invents_Act

Let say I want to know if that page has any warning tags. If they just raise 203 when that page is tagged, then that gives the status of that page with the tag raised. Does wikipedia have standard warning tags; how long did it take for you to figure that out across all wikipedias in each language for that page; do they all agree; who else agrees on how long that took while indeterminate; who agrees on the last known version of that page while OK; the GFDL helped in the issue that wants only to verify the first and last version as the cover pages; historic digital signage exists with "authorized-information".

If 203, save your breath...  ... about "doing normal" 200 things.

Would you ask your client for their password when you know that status code is 203 and not 200?